%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%>
|
||||
COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS Riparians do not see lake access as a problem while nonriparian do. Nearly 60% of all respondents see intensity of lake shore
development as a problem. Traffic congestion
is not seen as a significant
problem while the conditions
of the roads are a concern. There is a general agreement among groups, though not a
majority agree, that lack of job opportunities; lack of skilled job
availability; and seasonal employment are problems. Lack of an industrial park in the township is not
perceived to be a problem. 2 - 4 Lack of
affordable housing is seen as a
problem among nonriparian and year-round residents. Loss of farm land
is viewed as a problem by close to 45% of all respondents. Thirty percent do not see it as a
problem. Two-thirds of
property owners either see loss of rural character
as a problem or are undecided. Rapid growth is viewed as either a problem or potential problem. Slightly
more than one-third of respondents feel that rapid growth is not a problem. Limited, controlled
growth was favored by virtually all groups of respondents. There is little support for increasing the amount of land
for mobile
homes. If mobile homes are allowed, the preference is to locate these in mobile
home parks. Landowners generally agree that there is adequate allocation of land for
duplexes, apartments or condominium units, and seasonal or vacation homes. Over 60% of
landowners said that current levels of allocation for single family
homes is adequate. There is little
support for allocating more land to commercial uses. An overwhelming majority of the respondents believe that current allocations of land to
overnight lodging establishments and office
and service uses are about right. There appears to be general agreement that less land
should be allocated to highway strip commercial, discount and outlet malls, or large regional shopping
centers. Almost half of the
respondents indicate the present allocation of land for small shopping centers is about right. Heavy
manufacturing is not desired in the township, nor is land for storage and wholesale
facilities. Most support (23%) was evident for allocating more land
to light
industrial uses, while nearly 60% of respondents feel current levels are about right. The greatest support appears for allocating more land to
park lands
and forest lands. There is two-thirds agreement that commercial
agriculture is at about the right level, although, 2
- 5 a fairly significant percentage (47%) feel
that more land should be allocated for open space. Over half of the respondents support additional land acquisition for parks with "low impact and
quiet sports" such as bicycle
paths. Allocation for other types of
recreational uses is deemed adequate or over abundant (golf courses, ORV trails and shooting ranges). There is almost unanimous agreement among property owners that desirable qualities
of the township include clean air and water, scenic views of open space and water, and lack of crime. There is
also strong agreement that maintaining farmland, forest land, rural image, and recreational opportunities are
either very important or somewhat important. A clear majority of landowners also
highly value the rest of the
qualities of the township, i.e., sense of
community; informal lifestyle; slower
pace of life; and locally owned family businesses. A majority of
landowners value small population; small town atmosphere; little industry; and
in-home businesses. There is
overwhelming agreement among landowners that resource protection measures are important. There appears
to be general support among landowners for strict local regulations to protect
land. There is also noticeable support to
require open space in new developments, and for stronger enforcement of local ordinances. There is much less agreement among landowners over such land protection measures as: government
purchase of land via special millage, or
other taxes earmarked for development rights purchases. The most favored activities are identified as tourism and resort related businesses, farming, light
manufacturing, and commercial/retail. Comments
generally were not favorable toward providing governmental
incentives for economic development. It seems to be felt that expanded economic activity will be a natural product
of area growth in general. 2 - 6 |
||||